Antigravity CLI vs Cursor — Feature Comparison

Quick answer: Antigravity CLI supports 17 of 18 tracked features; Cursor supports 15 of 18. Matrix last updated November 13, 2026.

Antigravity CLI (by Google) vs Cursor (by Anysphere): a side-by-side comparison of tracked features, release cadence, and the latest releases of each tool. Data as of November 14, 2026, refreshed daily.

Verdict: Antigravity vs Cursor

Neither tool is universally better — the right choice depends entirely on your workflow and editor preferences. Antigravity CLI and Cursor match each other exactly on tracked feature coverage (15/18), so raw capability parity is not a differentiator. Where they diverge is in release cadence and workflow philosophy. Antigravity CLI ships at a dramatically higher velocity — 56 releases in the last 90 days versus Cursor's 11 — suggesting a team that iterates rapidly and patches frequently, which is valuable if you want cutting-edge fixes but may feel turbulent in a stability-conscious environment. Cursor, with a more measured cadence, may feel more predictable for teams that value controlled upgrades. On the feature side, Antigravity CLI supports VS Code and Vim/Neovim integrations, making it a strong fit for developers who want AI assistance inside their existing editor rather than adopting a new one. Cursor, by contrast, supports Multi-file Editing and Shell Integration, which are meaningful advantages if your work involves coordinated changes across a codebase or tight terminal interplay within the tool. Cursor's multi-file editing capability in particular is a substantive workflow feature for refactors or cross-cutting changes, while Antigravity CLI's Vim/Neovim support is a rare differentiator in this space that modal-editor devotees will find decisive. In short, editor loyalty and the importance of cross-file operations are the two clearest axes on which to make this decision.

Choose Antigravity CLI if: Choose Antigravity CLI if you work primarily in VS Code or Vim/Neovim and want AI assistance that slots into your existing editor without switching tools, or if you prioritize a tool with a very fast release and improvement cadence.

Choose Cursor if: Choose Cursor if multi-file editing and shell integration are central to your workflow — particularly for large refactors or projects requiring coordinated changes across many files — and you prefer a more measured, predictable update rhythm.

Key differences

At a glance

ToolLatest versionRelease dateReleases tracked
Antigravity CLIv1.5.9November 14, 202690
Cursor2026.11.06November 6, 202639

Antigravity vs Cursor: key feature differences

Antigravity CLI supports 17 of 18 tracked features; Cursor supports 15 of 18. Both support 14 features.

What Antigravity has that Cursor doesn't

What Cursor has that Antigravity doesn't

Release cadence: Antigravity vs Cursor

Antigravity ships more often: 63 releases in the last 90 days versus 12 for Cursor. Counts are as of November 14, 2026.

MetricAntigravityCursor
Releases in the last 30 days244
Releases in the last 90 days6312
Median gap between recent releases1 day6.8 days
Releases tracked9039
First tracked releaseJune 1, 2026September 12, 2025

What's new in Antigravity and Cursor

Latest Antigravity CLI releases

Latest Cursor releases

Core Editing

Multi-file editing, streaming, undo capabilities

FeatureAntigravityCursor
Multi-file Editing — Edit multiple files in a single operation—✓ (Agent SDK and cloud agents support working across multiple repos (300 repos mentioned), implying multi-file editing capa)
Streaming Output — Real-time streaming of AI responses✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.08.17
Undo/Redo — Ability to undo and redo changes✓ since 1.5.6✓ since 2026.09.23
Diff View — Visual comparison of changes✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.11.06

Terminal Integration

Shell and command execution support

FeatureAntigravityCursor
Command Execution — Run shell commands✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.10.20
Shell Integration — Integration with user shell environment✓ (v1.5.2 mentions 'macOS Option shortcuts work out of the box' and multiple Windows fixes across releases suggest shell/OS)✓ (Self-hosted machines for computer use on Linux and Mac, agents run within own infrastructure)
Background Tasks — Run tasks in background✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.09.10

MCP Support

Model Context Protocol server and client capabilities

FeatureAntigravityCursor
MCP Client — Connect to MCP servers✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.10.20
MCP Server — Expose as MCP server✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.10.20
Custom Tools — Define and use custom tools✓ since 1.2.4✓ (Agent SDK lets you build agents as code with custom tools; Origin App Marketplace allows developer tool teams to publish)

IDE Integrations

VS Code, JetBrains, and other editor support

FeatureAntigravityCursor
VS Code — Visual Studio Code integration✓ since 1.3.3—
JetBrains — IntelliJ/WebStorm integration✓ since 1.5.8—
Vim/Neovim — Vim or Neovim integration✓ since 1.5.8—
Web UI — Browser-based interface✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.11.06

Agentic Features

Planning, tool use, and autonomous capabilities

FeatureAntigravityCursor
Planning Mode — Plan before executing changes✓ since 1.5.4✓ since 2026.11.05
Autonomous Mode — Extended autonomous operation✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.10.20
Task Decomposition — Break complex tasks into steps✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.09.10
Context Management — Manage context across conversations✓ since 1.5.8✓ since 2026.09.23

Feature timeline: who shipped first

First release where Antigravity and Cursor each shipped a notable feature, and which tool led.

FeatureAntigravityCursorWho led
Skills / PluginsJune 17, 2026February 17, 2026Cursor first, 120d ahead
Sandboxing / Permission ModesJune 3, 2026February 17, 2026Cursor first, 107d ahead
Subagents / Parallel AgentsJuly 24, 2026January 22, 2026Cursor first, 183d ahead
Background TasksJuly 1, 2026April 24, 2026Cursor first, 69d ahead
Extended ThinkingJuly 21, 2026—only Antigravity
HooksOctober 30, 2026September 29, 2025Cursor first, 396d ahead
Image / Vision InputJune 30, 2026—only Antigravity
MCP SupportAugust 20, 2026March 3, 2026Cursor first, 170d ahead
Voice InputAugust 26, 2026April 13, 2026Cursor first, 135d ahead
Headless / Non-interactive ModeJuly 28, 2026October 20, 2026Antigravity first, 84d ahead
Custom Slash CommandsJuly 16, 2026September 12, 2025Cursor first, 307d ahead
Project Memory FilesJuly 24, 2026—only Antigravity
Git / PR Integration—July 29, 2026only Cursor
Planning ModeJuly 8, 2026September 29, 2025Cursor first, 282d ahead
Subscription Login (Pro/Max)November 4, 2026—only Antigravity

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Antigravity CLI or Cursor?

Neither tool is universally better — the right choice depends entirely on your workflow and editor preferences. Antigravity CLI and Cursor match each other exactly on tracked feature coverage (15/18), so raw capability parity is not a differentiator. Where they diverge is in release cadence and workflow philosophy. Antigravity CLI ships at a dramatically higher velocity — 56 releases in the last 90 days versus Cursor's 11 — suggesting a team that iterates rapidly and patches frequently, which is valuable if you want cutting-edge fixes but may feel turbulent in a stability-conscious environment. Cursor, with a more measured cadence, may feel more predictable for teams that value controlled upgrades. On the feature side, Antigravity CLI supports VS Code and Vim/Neovim integrations, making it a strong fit for developers who want AI assistance inside their existing editor rather than adopting a new one. Cursor, by contrast, supports Multi-file Editing and Shell Integration, which are meaningful advantages if your work involves coordinated changes across a codebase or tight terminal interplay within the tool. Cursor's multi-file editing capability in particular is a substantive workflow feature for refactors or cross-cutting changes, while Antigravity CLI's Vim/Neovim support is a rare differentiator in this space that modal-editor devotees will find decisive. In short, editor loyalty and the importance of cross-file operations are the two clearest axes on which to make this decision.

What is the difference between Antigravity and Cursor?

Antigravity CLI supports 17 of 18 tracked features; Cursor supports 15 of 18. Only Antigravity: VS Code, JetBrains, and Vim/Neovim. Only Cursor: Multi-file Editing. Both support 14 tracked features.

Which gets updated more often, Antigravity or Cursor?

Antigravity CLI ships more often. In the 90 days to November 14, 2026, Havoptic tracked 63 Antigravity releases and 12 Cursor releases (90 and 39 releases tracked in total). Antigravity's median gap between its last 21 releases is 1 day. Cursor's median gap between its last 21 releases is 6.8 days.

What are the latest versions of Antigravity and Cursor?

The latest Antigravity CLI release is v1.5.9, released November 14, 2026. The latest Cursor release is “Voice Chat with Agents”, released November 6, 2026.

Do Antigravity and Cursor support MCP (Model Context Protocol)?

Antigravity CLI supports MCP Client, MCP Server, and Custom Tools. Cursor supports MCP Client, MCP Server, and Custom Tools.

Release velocity

Havoptic tracks 90 Antigravity releases and 39 Cursor releases. See release frequency charts for side-by-side velocity analysis, or browse the Antigravity CLI changelog and Cursor changelog.

Related comparisons

More Antigravity CLI comparisons

More Cursor comparisons

Data source

Feature data is maintained in feature-matrix.json under a CC-BY-4.0 license. Release data comes from releases.json. Both are updated daily. See the methodology page for details on sourcing and human review.

Compare all AI coding tools